What Willem told me, why I reached out, and what happened afterward.
Written from my point of view. This page separates my recollection from what the messages actually show.
The group-page screenshot provides community context; it is not an allegation against the group or its members.
Choose where to start
One afternoon, Willem and I were watching TV and drinking. During that time, he told me something that bothered me. He said that, while a woman he knew was away returning an animal she had been pet-sitting, he took her underwear without her knowledge and used it sexually.
That is what he told me. I did not witness the incident myself. I am not claiming that I did.
The conversation did not end that afternoon. Over the following week, I spoke with him more about what he had told me. We talked about why he had not told her, what it meant to cross someone’s boundaries, and why he was still pursuing a relationship with her. Some of those follow-up conversations happened when I was no longer drinking.
At first, I tried to leave it alone. Eventually, I decided to warn the woman privately. My reason was simple: if someone told me they had done that with another person’s belongings, I believed the person affected deserved to know what had been said.
My understanding is that she initially expressed that the conduct was wrong and indicated she would cut contact. I also understand that she later disputed that position. Those conversations are not independently established by the screenshots shown on this page, so I am not presenting either reaction as settled fact.
Willem told me about alleged conduct involving a woman's belongings. The exact date of this conversation is not established by the screenshots. This is my recollection, not a recording.
The messages first show us discussing plans to hang out at 1:15 PM. At 7:54 PM I asked about being treated differently when making plans with Anna. The conversation then moved to how he treated both of us. At 8:30 PM I explicitly said I would stay out of the Anna situation. At 8:32 PM, Serazel said he might tell her himself. See these timestamped messages
Later that evening, Serazel continued discussing whether Anna should be told and described his feelings toward her. The messages do not show that I contacted Anna that day.
He apologized for the previous day at 10:45 AM. At 1:50 PM he asked whether I was upset; at 1:58 PM I said I felt disappointed. At 2:40 PM I questioned the boundaries involved and his continued pursuit of a relationship. At 2:41 PM he responded by referring to what he had done to her. See the dated messages.
The conversation continued about responsibility, his feelings, and boundaries. At 3:09 PM, he said he had written to Anna about moving on romantically. At 3:39 PM, he asked that I stop weighing in on decisions he said did not directly involve me. See the dated messages.
I challenged the distinction between ordinary mistakes and the conduct we had discussed. At 3:43 PM, I explicitly said I was leaving the matter alone at that point. At 3:44 PM, he said he regretted having told me. Later messages discussed his disclosure and our disagreement. These messages do not show that I had warned her by that afternoon. See the dated messages.
My account is that the issue developed over approximately a week rather than in a single exchange. The warning is now documented on September 13, while dates for some later group conversations still need verification.
I sent Anna a Discord message explaining what Willem had told me about alleged conduct involving her belongings. The screenshot shows what I reported to her, not independent verification of the underlying allegation. See the original message.
Anna texted that she had received and read my Discord message. She thanked me for bringing it to her attention, asked that I not tell Willem she had spoken to me, and said she would reconsider their friendship. See her response.
In a later text, Anna said she had removed and blocked him, and thanked me for telling her. This documents what she told me at the time, not the status of their relationship afterward. See the dated text.
Later group messages and responses show a dispute about why I shared the information and how it was discussed with others. The dates of those specific messages should be added when their on-screen timestamps can be verified. See earlier exhibits.
Date labels distinguish dates printed in a message from file metadata. “Today” is relative to when a screenshot was captured. Dates are not inferred from filenames or upload times.
These screenshots show dates and times displayed inside Discord. They are ordered by the visible message timestamps, not the date the images were saved. Some screenshots overlap to preserve context; missing messages or days are not reconstructed.
These three screenshots document when I contacted Anna and what she said afterward. The first shows my report of what Willem had told me; the other two show Anna’s own replies.
.png)
The messages document what was written in the conversation, not independent proof of the underlying alleged conduct. The week-long sequence beyond September 12 remains partially undated.
When I use the phrase “crossing boundaries,” I mean allegedly handling someone's private, intimate belongings without their knowledge or permission. In the account Willem gave me, that meant going through Anna’s underwear while she was away. This is about privacy and consent—not an ordinary disagreement between friends.
I learned about the alleged conduct from what Willem told me. I did not witness it myself. The messages show what he said afterward and what I reported to Anna; they do not independently establish every detail of the underlying event.
I did not think this was a normal secret to keep. It involved another person’s belongings and boundaries. If the account he gave me was accurate, she was the person affected.
I told her because I thought she should have the information and decide for herself what to do with it. That is different from trying to make that decision for her.
I understand that others disagree with how I handled it, and I am not asking people to take my word as proof of the underlying incident. I am explaining why I acted and showing the conversations I can document.
Name clarification: Willem and “Serazel” refer to the same person in this account. Serazel is the username used in the Discord messages.
The person I am talking about is Willem, who used the name Serazel in our Discord conversations. We knew each other socially through overlapping interests and people in the local gaming community.
His own messages refer to “what I did,” regret over telling me, and a belief that his conduct had consequences. They are important context. They are not a recording of the original event or a complete written description of the alleged incident.
The screenshots are provided so readers can distinguish what I remember from what is written down.
The argument changed quickly. Instead of only discussing what I had been told, people asked why I brought it up and why I would share something that had been told to me in confidence.
A family member wrote “In confidence” in response to my explanation. A member of our shared circle asked “why now,” said they had known Willem longer, and eventually told me to leave them alone. I am including those exchanges because they help explain how the disagreement unfolded, not because knowing someone for longer proves anything about the original allegation.
One of my messages in the group discussion says that I did not want to tell everyone; I wanted to tell the person I believed had been affected. That is the distinction I have been trying to make.
This video is included only to establish that we were in contact during this period. It does not establish the date of the alleged incident or prove any allegation described on this page.
Video supplied for this account · Context for contact during this period; no date independently verified.
These are copies of the screenshot files I provided. Tap or click an image to open it at full size. The existing blacked-out portions were already in the supplied images.
Screenshot metadata: September 12, 2024 · The messages display “Today,” not a full calendar date.
My message about boundaries and the response beginning “given what I did to her...”
Original file: IMG_0462(2).png · View full size
Screenshot metadata: September 12, 2024 · The messages display “Today,” not a full calendar date.
A reply saying he should not have told anyone about what he did.
Original file: IMG_0467(1).png · View full size
Screenshot metadata: September 12, 2024 · The messages display “Today,” not a full calendar date.
He says “You have done nothing wrong,” then argues about expectations and boundaries.
Original file: IMG_0468(1).png · View full size
Calendar date not visible in this screenshot; no date assigned.
The discussion turns into an argument over telling other people, including “why don’t you tell them what I did.”
Original file: IMG_3976.jpeg · View full size
Calendar date not visible in this screenshot; no date assigned.
Messages showing that a family member viewed the disclosure as a breach of confidence.
Original file: IMG_3978.jpeg · View full size
Message time visible in screenshot; calendar date not shown. File metadata reflects an October 28, 2026 export, not necessarily the conversation date.
My question about why the issue was not being taken seriously.
Original file: IMG_4218.png · View full size
Message time visible in screenshot; calendar date not shown. File metadata reflects an October 28, 2026 export, not necessarily the conversation date.
A reply focuses on knowing Willem longer; I explain why I am relying on texts.
Original file: IMG_4219.png · View full size
Message time visible in screenshot; calendar date not shown. File metadata reflects an October 28, 2026 export, not necessarily the conversation date.
The person asks why I spoke up later and tells me to stop contacting them.
Original file: IMG_4220.png · View full size
Additional screenshots that were shared in the conversation but not available as downloadable source files for this build are not represented as though they were reviewed or included. Two other available images showing unrelated individuals’ contact and event details were intentionally omitted from the public-facing gallery.
I stand by my account of what Willem told me, my reason for telling her, and the messages I have kept. I am not asking anyone to harass him or anyone else. I want people to understand the difference between what I was told, what I personally did, and what I can show in writing.
I believe I had good reason to contact her. People can disagree with that choice. But the discussion should be about what happened and what the evidence actually says—not a story that makes the person who raised the concern the entire issue.